Use Vlads Test Target to Fine Tune Epson V850 Scanner

I have a customer who is going to use @VladsTestTarget to calibrate the height of  Epson V850 flatbed scanner's film holders.  Hope that will be helpful to other folks too. Here is the question and below is my answer. 

Q. "I am ordering this target to calibrate the height of my Epson V850 flatbed scanner film holders. Currently I am not satisfied with my film holder height adjustment attempts. I seems to unable to reach the peak of sharpness. My type 120 slides are all tack sharp on the light table with 6x loupe, but not so in the scanned output. Once I load test target in my scanner, I will evaluate a series of scans at different settings with my naked eye on my computer screen. One thing I am afraid of now is that I may not notice differences among 10~20(?) scans. I can narrow down the short list, but I am afraid I can hardly pinpoint which one or two scans are the absolute best in terms of sharpness. How can test targets help?"

A. Dear fellow digitizer! Please review below the two different approaches. 

USAF Approach

Using your scanner, make number of scans without Auto features and without any sharpening turned on. For each target's scan taken at the different film holder height, mark/name the output file - clearly indicating the current  folder height. Set certain magnification on your computer display -say 400% - and review centers and all four corners of the each image and find the smallest element for which you can discern both horizontal and vertical bars in the USAF 1951 patterns. See SilverFast document below for detailed explanation of procedure. The scanner or camera is said to “resolve” a chart element, if the horizontal and the vertical bars can still be recognized as three distinct bars and  they don’t blur into one another. 




Write the Group and Element numbers down on a piece of paper along with the file name. For each image you will have six values: file name, and Group/Element number for the center and four corners . If you want even more data point , you can add top, bottom and sides. The absolute numbers mean little for this exercise , you only need to know that if the smallest resolvable element is Group 0 Element 3, it's a better resolution than Group 0 Element 2.
 

At the end you will have the table with six (or ten ) columns and few rows (for the number of heights tested). Looking at this table alone you will be able to objectively call a winning folder height. Center and corner will give you different readings - that's normal  - you only care about relative value in the same spot. You may reload the target in the opposite direction rotating it 180 degrees and doing exercise again. That  should give you same or  very similar reading. Otherwise it may mean that holder is not absolutely parallel with sensor along sensor's line.   

Holistic Approach

You perform the scan of exactly the same area (with exactly the same scanner settings - no Auto settings!!! ) of the target at different holder heights. Save scans in jpg format. Compare the sizes of the files, the largest file will be the sharpest.

Explanation:  The scanner should be configured for the maximum contrast, so the minute details in pure whites and pure blacks are omitted. Then, the JPEG compression algorithm will do the thing for you - the image details which will mostly contribute to file size will be edges and the maximum number of edges should serve as an indicator of the high resolution and sharpness.

I know this does not sound like much fun, but the whole exercise is about getting as much image details from the film original as possible. So the ultimate reward for your hard work will be the ultimate scan quality.

Extra reading: 
https://www.silverfast.com/PDF/resolution-target/Resolution-Target_long_en.pdf

Extra video:



Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Using Vlads Test Targets to Fine-Tune Film Scanning Rig

Image
Part 1. Using Vlads Test Targets to Fine-Tune Film Scanning Rig So you decided to scan your film yourself. These days this  is quite a common and wise decision. You either decided to convert the priceless shots in your film archive or you just started your journey as a film photographer and want to share your best (and worst :-) ) shots with friends and mentors. You have to convert your film shots into digital form and be able to share them with a  click. The task is not new and since at least 20 years ago was widely available everywhere - from chain pharmacies to professional photo labs.   The option to save money has always existed  - you would buy your own scanner and off would you go. Many folks went that route and got lost. The time it would take to scan a few frames or a roll of film was anywhere from 10 minutes to hours. Paying extra 7-10 bucks for scanning was no longer such a costly proposition.  Fast forward to present times.  The landscape has completely changed. Photo Labs
Read more

Digitize Your Film with Confidence - Introduction Page

Image
In this innovative offering, the ten USAF 1951 test patterns are strategically placed throughout the 24x36mm film frame - one in the center, and the others scattered across sides and corners. This unique arrangement facilitates a comprehensive evaluation of the sharpness and focus across an entire negative or transparency/slide in one shot.  P hotographers can now accurately evaluate the performance of their lenses and camera systems across the whole frame. This is particularly advantageous for detecting any discrepancies or weaknesses in image quality, which might typically go unnoticed with conventional  single-pattern USAF 1951 target needing to be moved in camera field of view. 24x36 mm target on 35 mm Adox CMS Pro film Clean, nice, sharp corners make or break the great scanned image    Welcome to www.film4ever.digital - the home of  USAF 1951 Resolution Chart on real 35 mm and 120 film aka Vlads Test Target ! New 35 mm targets with extra Siemens stars (2021) Read here how I mysel
Read more

APO Rodagon D 2X 4.5/75 mm vs. Sigma 2.8/70 Macro Art - Fight of the Century

Image
If someone would want to compare the full size .png exports from the camera scans taken with Canon EOS R camera and APO Rodagon D 2X 4.5/75 mm and Sigma 2.8/70 Macro Art here is the link  https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1-2cN8blD7M6xQ9T-bDM5cK9z2toPtTZq?usp=sharing .  The film original is "Vlads Test Target" on 35 mm Adox CMS 20 Pro film.  The pictures in the series were taken at shutter speeds no longer then 1/160 sec at full range of lens apertures. The aperture setting is included in the file name. The folder QuickCompare contains the same images, but less informative parts of images were cut out so it's easier to compare the files.   Full scan: Abbreviated file: I would suggest to download the files locally and use Lightroom or similar app to review images at 100% - otherwise you will not see the differences. Let me just note that the scans resolution is limited by the camera sensor, not by the lenses. See my previous post for details:  https://www.facebook.co
Read more